Page 1 of 3

Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)

Posted: 07 Feb 2014, 01:40
by Excalibur
Who saw the debate between Bill Nye and Ken Ham???





Thoughts Comments??


Bill Nye Destroyed Ham.

Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)

Posted: 07 Feb 2014, 05:07
by Awesome Creep
Excalibur wrote:Bill Nye Destroyed Ham.


Yes. Bill Nye had a lot more points supporting his side, whereas with Ken Ham it felt like he was repeating the same point the entire time.

Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)

Posted: 07 Feb 2014, 10:49
by Shadow00
Awesome Creep wrote:
Excalibur wrote:Bill Nye Destroyed Ham.


Yes. Bill Nye had a lot more points supporting his side, whereas with Ken Ham it felt like he was repeating the same point the entire time.

The perfect description of when a scientist has an argument with a religious person over something religion related.
Facts vs the same point over and over again.
Result was pretty much expected.

Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)

Posted: 08 Feb 2014, 00:34
by Dr Frook
u cant argue with faith - no matter what is said - faith wins out.

Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)

Posted: 08 Feb 2014, 01:29
by Excalibur
FWG Leader wrote:u cant argue with faith - no matter what is said - faith wins out.




Not sure if you said that sarcastically.

Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)

Posted: 08 Feb 2014, 07:06
by mmm
Frook is a fervent Southern Baptist, he'd never say something about the Lord sarcastically.

I didn't watch the debate because Ken Hamm would probably have pissed me off. While I'm sure that one could rebuff some claims about Creationism being wrong, you can't win an argument that way.

In my opinion, who cares to what extent Christianity is "scientifically accurate?" The teachings, regardless of origin or time period or author, remain a hugely important moral compass for the world at large.

Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)

Posted: 08 Feb 2014, 22:33
by Lamb
I stopped very early on, but all I can say is, Lies... BUNCH OF LIES!!
I can accept the fact that perhaps there is a god or superior being, but to say that the world is 6000 years old?.. ._. I have nothing to say..

Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)

Posted: 09 Feb 2014, 16:49
by Excalibur
Idk, I keep my faith and science on different levels.

Ken Ham is kinda looney.

Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)

Posted: 09 Feb 2014, 18:13
by dankness75
Religion is like a way of life and people either go against it even when they claim to be part of that Religion. They give it a bad name.

Religion is very important in me life and I see that some of the things Science say, it's in the holy book.

Re: Creationists vs Scientists (Debate)

Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 21:27
by paladin
Honestly, Aliens are really the reason why we're here.