Page 1 of 2

Lance Armstrong - a big fat furry liar!

Posted: 26 Jan 2013, 03:58
by Dr Frook
was interviewed by Oprah, came 'clean' and then lied again, just in case the last two decades of lies were not enough.

shame, Lance Armstrong, shame!

Image

Re: Lance Armstrong - a big fat furry liar!

Posted: 26 Jan 2013, 03:59
by Master of Pie
Furry? And he's not exactly fat, either...

Re: Lance Armstrong - a big fat furry liar!

Posted: 27 Jan 2013, 00:05
by Dr Frook
must be the drugs

Re: Lance Armstrong - a big fat furry liar!

Posted: 28 Jan 2013, 02:27
by Lamb
mind telling me the entire story now?
I am now confused because I don't know if he is lieing about ever taking drugs or lieing about him lieing about taking them...

Re: Lance Armstrong - a big fat furry liar!

Posted: 29 Jan 2013, 02:31
by Dr Frook
he said he was taking drugs up to 2005. Lots of drugs, blood transfusions etc. Always denied it until now. But in the interview, claims that he was drug free in 2009/10 when he made his come back. Unfortunately, blood test results clearly show he was still cheating. He's worried about legal repercussions, so cant admit to the more recent cheating. As I said, he is a big fat furry liar, pants on fire.

Re: Lance Armstrong - a big fat furry liar!

Posted: 31 Jan 2013, 03:20
by Toady
He was giving his team drugs as well...A lot of great cyclists were lost because of their refusing to take the drugs...

Re: Lance Armstrong - a big fat furry liar!

Posted: 02 Feb 2013, 10:57
by Dr Frook
most of them are cheats though. Lance, being a big fat furry liar, is just the biggest one.

Re: Lance Armstrong - a big fat furry liar!

Posted: 04 Feb 2013, 13:06
by Dr Frook

Re: Lance Armstrong - a big fat furry liar!

Posted: 07 Feb 2013, 12:20
by Shadowstar1922
Things like this absolutely disgust me, how some people in National Sports can be like. It feels much better in my eyes, to try your freaking hardest and loose, than rather to put in little to no effort and come out on top. -_-

Re: Lance Armstrong - a big fat furry liar!

Posted: 09 Feb 2013, 17:38
by Walking Zombee
This make just about 0 sense to me, the guy that comes in first place is accused of blood doping, but people that come mere SECONDS behind him, are petfectly fine? Its just not right.