a new banning tecknick

Put your suggestions on how to improve the community here
User avatar
Lightning Orb
The Superior Orby
Posts: 3157
Joined: 28 Feb 2010, 17:06
Location: Cloud 69
Contact:

Re: a new banning tecknick

Postby Lightning Orb » 10 May 2011, 20:28

Hitokiri wrote:a righteous punishment isn't abuse
*big slap*
now behave :P

Any child can be hit and call it abuse. That helped lots of kids get away from their parents, dude.
Most Likely To Win The Lottery.. But Lose Ticket![/b]
#2016FWGAwards

User avatar
someguy
FWG Prince
Posts: 413
Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 14:39
Location: i live in a house
Contact:

Re: a new banning tecknick

Postby someguy » 16 May 2011, 14:38

The Fish wrote:Only problem with that is how bias people can get against certain mods.

Let's say Mod A came on 4-5pm. They have to ban twice as much because there are twice as many people on, or maybe it is a time full of dating and spammers.

Mod B goes on 7-8pm. There are only the regulars on at that time and they rarely have to ban.

Word goes round that Mod A is the one banning most of the daters/spammers. It wouldn't be so nice for them if all of the people who were banned started picking on them now.

As for the ban song/picture, if you're getting banned you've done something wrong, you shouldn't get "rewarded" by a funny song or picture, in my opinion. People will want to get banned just to see it, that will create so much troubleok ok how about we reward them with a sreamer that screams your banned.
ok ok how about we reward them with a sreamer that screams your banned.
This guy is the embodiment of cringe.
[img]https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-v9PdfKlA2WE/TfYGXjiZJ5I/AAAAAAAABmA/gJslrGtGfPw/h120/dancing+pig.gif[/img]
Sg's Piggy

User avatar
pudingeX
The Supreme Noobie Doobie
Posts: 1769
Joined: 17 Feb 2010, 11:15
Location: In Uranus... HAHAHA

Re: a new banning tecknick

Postby pudingeX » 17 May 2011, 12:21

someguy wrote:
The Fish wrote:Only problem with that is how bias people can get against certain mods.

Let's say Mod A came on 4-5pm. They have to ban twice as much because there are twice as many people on, or maybe it is a time full of dating and spammers.

Mod B goes on 7-8pm. There are only the regulars on at that time and they rarely have to ban.

Word goes round that Mod A is the one banning most of the daters/spammers. It wouldn't be so nice for them if all of the people who were banned started picking on them now.

As for the ban song/picture, if you're getting banned you've done something wrong, you shouldn't get "rewarded" by a funny song or picture, in my opinion. People will want to get banned just to see it, that will create so much troubleok ok how about we reward them with a sreamer that screams your banned.
ok ok how about we reward them with a sreamer that screams your banned.

I would love to get banned if I will be rewarded...
Yos

User avatar
Aros
FWG King
Posts: 786
Joined: 09 Jun 2010, 02:24

Re: a new banning tecknick

Postby Aros » 29 May 2011, 03:16

badddd idea,y should u get rewarded for being banned?its supposed to be a punishment,not a treat.peoplez would WANT to get banned if tht happened,so it would create a lot more havoc,and lead to a lot more bans.plus,if it shows who banned them,once the person who got banned is unbanned,they will just start yellin at the mod,leadin to another ban.
i shall throw peanuts at all who agree with this *gets peanuts ready*
Just some guy who used to come here a lot.

If for some reason you want to get in touch (idk what people on here use nowadays):
Discord: pablo#3067
Or just PM me on here and I'll give you my username for something you do have.

User avatar
someguy
FWG Prince
Posts: 413
Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 14:39
Location: i live in a house
Contact:

Re: a new banning tecknick

Postby someguy » 03 Jun 2011, 16:18

lol i was being sarcastic aro hehe you can say punish them with a load screamer that says there banned
This guy is the embodiment of cringe.
[img]https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-v9PdfKlA2WE/TfYGXjiZJ5I/AAAAAAAABmA/gJslrGtGfPw/h120/dancing+pig.gif[/img]
Sg's Piggy

User avatar
Aros
FWG King
Posts: 786
Joined: 09 Jun 2010, 02:24

Re: a new banning tecknick

Postby Aros » 03 Jun 2011, 17:59

i still dont see what ur hoping to get out of this
Just some guy who used to come here a lot.

If for some reason you want to get in touch (idk what people on here use nowadays):
Discord: pablo#3067
Or just PM me on here and I'll give you my username for something you do have.

User avatar
Angel valierre
FWG General
Posts: 128
Joined: 06 Apr 2011, 05:57
Location: Lives in a well-decorated house

Re: a new banning tecknick

Postby Angel valierre » 07 Jun 2011, 10:11

FWG Leader wrote:
Hitokiri wrote:indeed, it would give me too much work as most of the people would be juvenile as you are and complain about something you did wrong.

Like with most schoolkids these days really.
And then the parents defend their kids at all cost.
Where as in the old days if you did something wrong at school, got punished and told your parents about it, you'ld get extra punishment from them too.


I agree, the parents should beat the beep out of the kid if he does something wrong. It's the only way they will learn. Kids nowadays are overly protected. God knows what effect it will have on society in the future. Also, the internet has turned kiddies into little sheltered monsters.

the end.

ROFL little sheltered monsters XD
Anyways, this is a bad idea for others and for the Mods and our Leader plus they might have more work to do.
Last edited by Angel valierre on 24 Jun 2011, 08:55, edited 1 time in total.
Baudelaire

User avatar
PokemonTowerMaster
Noobie Doobie
Posts: 1
Joined: 07 Jun 2011, 22:40

Re: a new banning tecknick

Postby PokemonTowerMaster » 07 Jun 2011, 23:13

they should allow people to warn them.that way FWG can tell who should get banned and the Ban time


Return to “Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest