These groups, now joined together as one, hereby agree upon joining, to sign an MDoAP, and to help one another during a drastic time of war, or when a group calls upon them, and it is decided that the threat is great enough that the allied nations need step in, and enter the war, in order to maintain the integrity of both the group, and RP. Now, with 5 groups in the United Nations of RP, there is a limit to the groups allowed to join. You may not join without at least 5 members in your group, if you have a history of declaring war for no reason, or if there is a questionable characteristic of the group and/or leader. These limitations may be lifted or amended by the UN at any time.
Representatives
Wonderlanders: Fuipui
Lamb
Lightserver0
Pending...
The Scientists Legion: Chudders
Aros
Pending...
Pending...
The Bounty Hunters Group: Aros
Pending...
Pending...
Pending...
The Alchemist's Guild: Aleksander
Amy
Shadow00
Ghost
The UN of RP
-
Foopzheart
- SKREEEEEEEE
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: 26 Jun 2010, 22:36
- Location: SKREEEEE
- Contact:
Re: The UN of RP
So, it's sort of like a Peacekeeper group? If so, request to join and alliance.
Re: The UN of RP
As of right now, in a couple weeks this group might needed immensly...There is going to be an assault on FWG...Maybe...So we need to be prepared for this.
-
beana 9000
- FWG King
- Posts: 680
- Joined: 15 Jul 2011, 19:51
- Location: Gone. Just...gone.
Re: The UN of RP
I will help as much as I can. Count me in for this group.
Re: The UN of RP
I'll represent the scientists legion.
Chudd
Chudd
Last edited by chudders on 02 Dec 2011, 19:23, edited 2 times in total.
Re: The UN of RP
removed for stupidity reasons
Last edited by Lamb on 04 Feb 2012, 21:41, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The UN of RP
chudders wrote:I'll enter the whole scientists legion into this. Also, i recommend we have a group of leaders (the leader of each group within this one is one of the leaders)
Chudd
no, we do not have one specific leader...it would mess us up and it will make us seem like we are a dominant group
Re: The UN of RP
eagle789 wrote:chudders wrote:I'll enter the whole scientists legion into this. Also, i recommend we have a group of leaders (the leader of each group within this one is one of the leaders)
Chudd
no, we do not have one specific leader...it would mess us up and it will make us seem like we are a dominant group
Um...I said a GROUP of leaders.
Re: The UN of RP
chudders wrote:eagle789 wrote:chudders wrote:I'll enter the whole scientists legion into this. Also, i recommend we have a group of leaders (the leader of each group within this one is one of the leaders)
Chudd
no, we do not have one specific leader...it would mess us up and it will make us seem like we are a dominant group
Um...I said a GROUP of leaders.
No, because they can be biased leaders...If we have the members be their own counselors and have their own mind...then it would be more interesting and safe.
Re: The UN of RP
eagle789 wrote:chudders wrote:eagle789 wrote:no, we do not have one specific leader...it would mess us up and it will make us seem like we are a dominant group
Um...I said a GROUP of leaders.
No, because they can be biased leaders...If we have the members be their own counselors and have their own mind...then it would be more interesting and safe.
So basically it's got no leader just every1 votes or something?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests
